AddieStan

In an e-mail exchange with your blogstress, her good friend, Phillip Coons of The Delusional Duck , writes: Forget what you read about the general and Rumsfeld being at odds or that special provisions will be written so that technically Hayden won't be in the DoD [Department of Defense] chain of command while serving as director. For the folks at the CIA to ever trust him, he has to shed the uniform. What do you think, mes amis ?

Can anybody tell your blogstress how the nomination of Gen. Michael V. Hayden to the directorate of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) went, in the course of a day, from being " troubled " to " on track "? At his nomination hearing, Hayden consistently stonewalled on significant questions: detainees, NSA domestic spying and his role in such. (Of course, toi et moi will never know what he told the senators on double super-secret background in the closed session.) Your cybertrix believes that unless every Democrat on that committee votes "no" on moving this nomination to the floor, the idea of an opposition party is a cruel illusion. CLICK HERE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

On a different subject, a visit to The Delusional Duck yielded this overlooked tidbit on the criminal investigation of Air Force Chief of Staff Michael Moseley and his precessor, Gen. John Jumpers, for some funny business regarding a $49.9 million contract. Duck drew on the work of ABC's indefatigable Brian Ross for the goods. You'll recall that your blogstress had a conversation with Mr. Ross earlier this week for FishbowlDC in which Mr. Ross alleged that the government had turned anti-terrorism tools on reporters, including him.

Your blogstress's good friend, Phillip Coons of The Delusional Duck writes: Addie, I feel this is an important point! From Navy Times : Asked whether he is considering retiring from the military to take the CIA post, Hayden, dressed in his Air Force uniform bearing a host of medals, told the panel: “The fact that I have to decide what tie to put on in the morning doesn’t change who I am.” He said a more important issue was whether he could “bond” with those at the CIA. If the uniform “gets in the way of that, I’ll make the right decision.” CLICK HERE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

Although your blogstress would like to spend the rest of her day lolling about in her négligée , eating bon-bons and watching C-SPAN, other duties call -- and these blow-hards were supposed to have been in closed session by now. Your Webwench does, however, assure her devotees that she shall return later for a display of her customary wit as she dissects the remains of today's proceedings. CLICK HERE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

The Senate intelligence committee return from its lunchbreak not long ago, and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) did one of those obnoxious, solicitous rounds of questioning for which he is famous. Here's your Webwench's paraphrase: General, did you approve this program because you wanted to pry in to the private lives of ordinary Americans? What's the guy gonna say. Indeed I did, Senator! CLICK HERE FOR A PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

Your blogstress could be wrong, but it seems to her that Gen. Hayden addressed neither Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) by their rightful titles. While the men who questioned the general were often addressed as "Senator," the only honorific he had for the women as "Ma'am." Looks like somebody needs a kick in the pants by a stiletto-heeled pump. CLICK HERE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS SO FAR FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

After being stonewalled by Gen. Hayden -- who declined to answer most of her questions in open session -- Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), apparently thinking she was off-mike, said, "He didn't answer any of them."

Under a grilling by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) about the NSA's adherence (or not) to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, Hayden refuted the notion that searches may be conducted only by warrant. According to the amendment, Hayden said, and according to "relatives of mine who are in law school," (emphasis added by blogstress) the comma that comes between the clause between the protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" and the one defining the terms of warrants means that a warrant is not necessary for a search that is deemed "reasonable" by the NSA. So let's get this right: Hayden is saying that he gets to decide what constitutes a reasonable search based on the judgment of law school students to whom he is related. Your Webwench is no constitutional scholar, but she suspects and absence of checks and balances in this scheme. Later, in trying to explain himself further to Sen. Feinstein, Gen. Hayden described the stan...

"Values are about following the law and doing what you say you are going to do....General, in evaluating your words, I now have trouble accepting your credibility..." --Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)

Hayden seems to have just told Levin that the guidelines for prisoner treatment outlined by the Army Field Manual do not apply to the CIA.

In answer to a question from Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), Gen. Hayden disputed reporting in Sunday's New York Times that NSA lawyers had questioned the legality of the domestic spying the agency undertook under Hayden's leadership.

Levin could not get an answer from Gen. Hayden as to whether or not the news reports on domestic spying by the National Security Agency (NSA) represent the whole of the program. He'll only say so in closed session, he says. Note that Levin wasn't asking what the program entails, just whether or not the full scope of the program has been revealed.

Gen. Hayden just told Sen. Kit Bond (R) that there is "easily documented evidence" that the the revelation of the NSA's domestic spying "has impacted the enemy." The general went on to say that the revelation means that now the U.S. will be catching mostly "dumb terrorists" because the smart ones have been tipped off. "It's Dawinian," he said. Does anybody really believe that before that revelation, the smart terrorists assumed nobody was listening?

To watch the Hayden nomination hearing in Real Player, click here .

Chairman Roberts to nominee Michael Hayden: ROBERTS: General, do you agree to appear before the committee here or in other venues when invited? HAYDEN: Yes, sir. ROBERTS: Do you agree to send Central Intelligence Agency officials to appear before the committee and designated staff when invited? HAYDEN: Absolutely, yes, sir. ROBERTS: Do you agree to provide documents or any material requested by the committee in order for it to carry out its oversight and its legislative responsibilities? HAYDEN: Yes, sir. ROBERTS: Will you ensure that the Central Intelligence Agency provide such material to the committee when requested? HAYDEN: Yes, sir. ROBERTS: Do you renounce Satan and all his works? HAYDEN: Yes, sir -- well, except for those that protect the lives of Americans in the War on Terror. All right, all right; your blogstress made that last part up.

Throughout today's hearing on the nomination of Gen. Michael Hayden to the post of director of central intelligence, your blogstress's devotees will hear references to a speech that Hayden delivered at the National Press Club in January, after The New York Times broke the news of NSA's domestic spying. Click here for the transcript of Hayden's National Press Club speech.

In his opening statement, Hayden said, "The CIA has got to get out of the news." Instead of blaming the CIA's celebrated problem-child status in the national news on internal leaks, Hayden might considering stopping the CIA from engaging in illegal activities like the U.S. of offshore, secret prisons where detainees are said to be tortured.

Your blogstress was intrigued by Gen. Hayden's paean, in his opening statement at his nomination hearing, to the man given the heave-ho whom the general was chosen to replace. Trying to appease Goss's pals on the Hill, perhaps?

Thank goodness for Michigan Senator Carl Levin who, in the Hayden hearing, is standing in for Jay Rockefeller, the committee's ranking Democratic member. Levin just essentially called the nation's attention to the lies the administration -- Hayden included -- has promulgated about the National Security Agency's widespread spying on Americans. While the administration has responded to last week's USA Today article on the massive database that, at the direction of Hayden, the NSA has created on the telephone traffic of virtually every American by saying, well, that's different from eavesdropping -- which the administration contends it is not doing on Jane and Joe Average. Not accepting the administration's framing of the issue, Levin argued not the merits of whether or not the American people mind their phone traffic being documented, but whether or not the American people have any reason to believe that that's all the administration is up to. Making his ...